Demetris Azoides vs Joshua Goodger Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Azoides vs Goodger analysis and find out who is favored!
Demetris Azoides vs Joshua Goodger Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Azoides 1 - 1 Goodger
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Azoides has won 46.85% of points on their second serve, while Goodger has won 46.41%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Azoides, in recent form, has won 57.61% of their opponent's second serve points, while Goodger has won 43.9%. The same stats for first serve returns are 34.08% and 31.4% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Azoides has saved 51.32% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Goodger has saved 58.82% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Azoides has won 51.43% of matches played (W/L 18/ 17), with Goodger winning 31.82% (W/L 7/ 15) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Azoides has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 55% (W/L 36/ 30), and worse career win % on Clay, winning 40% (W/L 4/ 6). Goodger has their best career surface win % on Grass, winning 50% (W/L 1/ 1), and worse career win % on I.hard, winning 45% (W/L 10/ 12).
- Player level: In the last year, Azoides has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 51.43% of matches (W/L 18/ 17), where as Goodger has played most of their matches on the Futures/Satellites/ITF tournaments $10K, winning 31.82% of matches (W/L 7/ 15). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Azoides winning 1 times and Goodger being victorious 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Azoides winning 2 and Goodger winning 2. The last match between Azoides and Goodger was at the M15 Alaminos-Larnaca, 20-03-2024, First, Clay with Joshua Goodger getting the victory 6-1 6-3.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 1:31:0.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Azoides and Goodger have played a deciding set 0 times, with Azoides winning 0 times and Goodger 0 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 0 tiebreaks against each other with Azoides winning 0, and Goodger 0.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Azoides has played against opponents with an average rank of 120.23 while Goodger has played against players with an average rank of 202.95.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Azoides has won 27% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Goodger has won 25% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Azoides has converted 42.5% of breakpoint opportunities, and Goodger has converted 45.83% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
0
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
0
Minor
N/A
Rank
High
23
Age
Plays
1
Total1
1
Hard0
0
Clay1
0
Indoor0
0
Grass0
821
Rank
821
High
25
Age
Plays
1
Total
0
Mast
0
Chall
0
Slam
0
Main
1
Minor
Form
53% (41-37)
Career Total W/L
47% (38-43)
50% (7-7)
YTD W/L
33% (2-4)
$0
Career Prize Money
$0
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Demetris Azoides vs Joshua Goodger For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Azoides VS Goodger
stats | Demetris Azoides | Joshua Goodger |
---|---|---|
All H2H Matches | 1 | 1 |
Sets Won | 2 | 2 |
Games Won | 16 | 16 |
Aces (Total) | 0 | 6 |
DFs (Total) | 8 | 6 |
Avg Match Time | 1:31:0 | 1:31:0 |
1st Serve % | 72% (76/106) | 64% (87/135) |
1st Serve Win% | 64% (49/76) | 62% (54/87) |
2nd Serve Win% | 40% (12/30) | 46% (22/48) |
BPs Won% (Total) | 33% (5/15) | 45% (5/11) |
Return Points W% | 44% (59/135) | 42% (45/106) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Deciding Set Win% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
1st set W, W | 100% (1/1) | 100% (1/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
1st set L, W | 0% (1/0) | 0% (1/0) |
Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
6-1 6-3 |
Joshua Goodger
Player
Demetris Azoides
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
||||
6-3 6-1 |
Demetris Azoides
Player
Joshua Goodger
76%
(
44 of
58)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
76)
0
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
5
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
29%
(
4 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
76)
76
Total Points Won
58
|
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
stats | Demetris Azoides | Joshua Goodger |
---|---|---|
YTD W/L | 50% (7/7) | 33% (2/4) |
Sets Win/Loss | 48% (15/16) | 36% (5/9) |
Games Win/Loss | 51% (139/131) | 48% (77/83) |
Hard Win/Loss | 58% (7/5) | 0% (0/0) |
Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/2) | 33% (1/2) |
Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 33% (1/2) |
Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Aces pg | 0.15 | 0.22 |
Aces Total | 20 | 17 |
DFs per game | 0.2 | 0.13 |
DFs Total | 27 | 10 |
Avg Match Time | 1:27:12 | 1:43:40 |
Avg Opp Rank | 197.57 | 187.33 |
1st Serve % | 64% (454/708) | 65% (283/436) |
1st Serve W% | 63% (284/454) | 68% (192/283) |
2nd Serve W% | 47% (119/254) | 46% (71/153) |
BPs Won% Total | 43% (34/80) | 46% (11/24) |
Return Pts W% | 43% (311/722) | 35% (135/381) |
Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Futures W/L | 50% (7/7) | 33% (2/4) |
Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (7/14) | 33% (2/6) |
Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/1) | 25% (1/4) |
Deciding Set W% | 67% (2/3) | 50% (1/2) |
1st set W, W | 100% (6/6) | 50% (2/1) |
1st set W, L | 0% (6/0) | 50% (2/1) |
1st set L, W | 13% (8/1) | 25% (4/1) |
Demetris Azoides Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Aziz Ouakaa
Player
Demetris Azoides
72%
(
31 of
43)
1st Serve %
60%
(
25 of
42)
1
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
1
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
40%
(
10 of
25)
58%
(
7 of
12)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
8 of
17)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
30%
(
13 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
57%
(
24 of
42)
54
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Demetris Azoides
Player
Florent Limani
62%
(
23 of
37)
1st Serve %
48%
(
14 of
29)
-
Aces
-
2
Double Faults
3
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
14%
(
2 of
14)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
20%
(
3 of
15)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
30%
(
11 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
83%
(
24 of
29)
50
Total Points Won
16
|
6-0 6-0 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Daniel Little
Player
Demetris Azoides
57%
(
43 of
75)
1st Serve %
71%
(
39 of
55)
8
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
77%
(
33 of
43)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
22 of
39)
38%
(
12 of
32)
2nd Serve Won
31%
(
5 of
16)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
40%
(
30 of
75)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
28 of
55)
73
Total Points Won
57
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
QF |
Kris Van Wyk
Player
Demetris Azoides
72%
(
41 of
57)
1st Serve %
70%
(
50 of
71)
0
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
66%
(
27 of
41)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
50%
(
8 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
7 of
21)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
39%
(
22 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
38 of
71)
73
Total Points Won
55
|
7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Demetris Azoides
Player
Ignasi Forcano
69%
(
38 of
55)
1st Serve %
59%
(
41 of
69)
2
Aces
3
1
Double Faults
4
68%
(
26 of
38)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
76%
(
13 of
17)
2nd Serve Won
43%
(
12 of
28)
27%
(
3 of
11)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
16 of
55)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
33 of
69)
72
Total Points Won
52
|
6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Demetris Azoides
Player
Hugo Soares
68%
(
34 of
50)
1st Serve %
62%
(
32 of
52)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
3
79%
(
27 of
34)
1st Serve Won
66%
(
21 of
32)
75%
(
12 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
22%
(
11 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
22 of
52)
61
Total Points Won
41
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
Q1 | 6-4 6-4 | H2H | |||
QF |
Ryuki Matsuda
Player
Demetris Azoides
64%
(
52 of
81)
1st Serve %
62%
(
57 of
92)
0
Aces
8
2
Double Faults
4
62%
(
32 of
52)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
39 of
57)
66%
(
19 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
37%
(
13 of
35)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
27%
(
3 of
11)
37%
(
30 of
81)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
40 of
92)
91
Total Points Won
82
|
6-3 2-6 6-3 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Demetris Azoides
Player
Corban Crowther
62%
(
59 of
95)
1st Serve %
58%
(
55 of
95)
1
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
4
71%
(
42 of
59)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
38 of
55)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
12 of
40)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
37%
(
35 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
45 of
95)
105
Total Points Won
85
|
6-7(7) 6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Demetris Azoides
Player
Gabriel Decamps
61%
(
65 of
107)
1st Serve %
54%
(
63 of
116)
0
Aces
1
3
Double Faults
12
62%
(
40 of
65)
1st Serve Won
60%
(
38 of
63)
43%
(
18 of
42)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
18 of
53)
44%
(
8 of
18)
Break Points Won
40%
(
6 of
15)
46%
(
49 of
107)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
60 of
116)
118
Total Points Won
105
|
6-2 5-7 6-4 | H2H |
view more
Joshua Goodger Recent Matches Played
opponent | Score | H2H | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
R2 |
Dan Alexandru Tomescu
Player
Joshua Goodger
67%
(
39 of
58)
1st Serve %
65%
(
49 of
75)
0
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
1
69%
(
27 of
39)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
29 of
49)
63%
(
12 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
11 of
26)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
35 of
75)
74
Total Points Won
59
|
7-6(4) 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Joshua Goodger
Player
Demetris Azoides
69%
(
41 of
59)
1st Serve %
67%
(
32 of
48)
2
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
2
71%
(
29 of
41)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
16 of
32)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
8 of
16)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
3)
34%
(
20 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
63
Total Points Won
44
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Miljan Zekic
Player
Joshua Goodger
67%
(
29 of
43)
1st Serve %
63%
(
44 of
70)
1
Aces
1
1
Double Faults
1
83%
(
24 of
29)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
24 of
44)
64%
(
9 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
13 of
26)
36%
(
4 of
11)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
23%
(
10 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
66
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Thomas Loxley
Player
Joshua Goodger
65%
(
62 of
95)
1st Serve %
64%
(
53 of
83)
7
Aces
7
1
Double Faults
3
66%
(
41 of
62)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
43 of
53)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
36%
(
34 of
95)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
26 of
83)
87
Total Points Won
91
|
5-7 7-6(3) 11-9 | H2H | ||
QF |
Patrick Brady
Player
Joshua Goodger
79%
(
52 of
66)
1st Serve %
62%
(
48 of
77)
0
Aces
2
0
Double Faults
4
67%
(
35 of
52)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
27 of
48)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
13 of
29)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
36%
(
24 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
37 of
77)
79
Total Points Won
64
|
7-6(5) 6-3 | H2H | ||
Q1 |
Joshua Goodger
Player
David Quayle
67%
(
48 of
72)
1st Serve %
62%
(
44 of
71)
3
Aces
3
0
Double Faults
4
83%
(
40 of
48)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
34 of
44)
42%
(
10 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
13 of
27)
33%
(
1 of
3)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
31%
(
22 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
24 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
69
|
4-6 7-6(2) 10-6 | H2H | ||
R2 |
Demetris Azoides
Player
Joshua Goodger
76%
(
44 of
58)
1st Serve %
61%
(
46 of
76)
0
Aces
4
6
Double Faults
5
75%
(
33 of
44)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
29%
(
4 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
40%
(
12 of
30)
42%
(
5 of
12)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
36%
(
21 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
39 of
76)
76
Total Points Won
58
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Joshua Goodger
Player
Simon Anthony Ivanov
62%
(
36 of
58)
1st Serve %
46%
(
30 of
65)
3
Aces
2
1
Double Faults
6
72%
(
26 of
36)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
21 of
30)
59%
(
13 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
14%
(
1 of
7)
33%
(
19 of
58)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
32 of
65)
71
Total Points Won
52
|
6-4 6-2 | H2H | ||
R1 |
Petros Chrysochos
Player
Joshua Goodger
55%
(
36 of
66)
1st Serve %
56%
(
41 of
73)
1
Aces
0
3
Double Faults
6
69%
(
25 of
36)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
28 of
41)
53%
(
16 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
25%
(
8 of
32)
46%
(
6 of
13)
Break Points Won
33%
(
3 of
9)
38%
(
25 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
51%
(
37 of
73)
78
Total Points Won
61
|
6-1 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
R2 |
Alec Deckers
Player
Joshua Goodger
71%
(
45 of
63)
1st Serve %
63%
(
47 of
75)
13
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
2
89%
(
40 of
45)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
32 of
47)
67%
(
12 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
14 of
28)
50%
(
2 of
4)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
17%
(
11 of
63)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
29 of
75)
81
Total Points Won
57
|
7-6(12) 6-2 | H2H |
view more
Azoides Vs Goodger Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Azoides are available here and Goodger photos here.